The information posted on PayrollTalk is for informational purposes only and is not intended to substitute for obtaining accounting, payroll, tax, or financial advice from a professional accountant.
Supplemental Unemployment Compensation Benefits
I was wondering if anyone had experience working with SUB pay plans? The recent ruling on February 23, 2010 (United States v. Quality Stores) has opened up a dialogue with my employer as to the qualifications of SUB pay. I believe that our "severance" payment plan does not qualify as SUB pay even if Revenue Ruling 90-72 is rejected. Does anyone have specifics on what qualifies as a SUB plan? Additionally, do individuals who were involuntarily terminated qualify for the plan?
Thank you!
Thank you!
Comments
http://www.payrolltalk.com/board/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=8628&p=39192&hilit=SUB+pay#p39192
I'll post the other three in another response - they won't all fit here - those are mainly David Warren bringing up the possibility in posts about severance pay -
http://www.payrolltalk.com/board/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=4980&hilit=sub+pay
http://www.payrolltalk.com/board/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=4925&p=19481&hilit=sub+pay#p19481
http://www.payrolltalk.com/board/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=4167&p=16755&hilit=sub+pay#p16755
That is, as I recall, the payments were intended to supplement unemployment benefits while the worker was receiving unemployment benefits.